Non so quante volte mi sarà successo di sentirmi chiedere il supporto mio e del blog ad iniziative di mailbombing indirizzate contro questo o quell'obiettivo, primo fra tutti il conduttore della Zanzara (vuoi per invocarne la rimozione al direttore di Radio 24 , vuoi per far sapere a Cruciani quant'è stronzo / maleducato / paraculo / vergognoso / infame / eccetera). Ho sempre risposto di no. Innanzi tutto perché spesso non condividevo l'oggetto o il tono della protesta. Ma in secondo luogo perché è mia ferma convinzione che l'invio organizzato di una moltitudine di bellicose e-mail, non spontanee ma indotte , sia un modo troppo aggressivo di esprimere una critica, l'equivalente elettronico di una molestia fisica.
Figuratevi quindi cosa posso pensare della scelta di Libero di pubblicare in prima pagina , lo scorso 4 dicembre, un elenco di parlamentari Finian, or any former PDL, accompanied by related pictures (as manifest in "Wanted Dead or Alive " of the old west) and e-mail (public data, but the issue is not privacy), all with an invitation to readers to write to the "traitors " not necessarily a polite feedback on their work. Such an operation, to mention a wonderful article of Francesco Merlo Republic on 5 December, is merely "an explicit invitation to stalking." It was not enough to give rise to a traditional collection of signatures?
Then it is clear, now and forever live the freedom of the press, including the poor press. Everything is legitimate, even a brutal campaign journalistic tones such as Libero, against which no one is asking for fines or closure. But expect to pass the idea that journalism is a normal, standard, with full dignity, and that do not cause needless raised eyebrow, which is what has sustained in practice yesterday Cruciani, to me is unacceptable. It 's a task, that of liberation, which disgusts me exactly how to Cruciani disgusted that journalism no problem to publish without wiretapping by criminal law or stolen photos on English beaches.
Yes, I am disgusted and I say loud and clear. The first page of the Dec. 4 Free is a crap, point. I say, to understand each other, based on questions of principle, in terms of civility, elegance, correctness, and not because I think that some idiot who reads the newspaper Belpietro can then go to clout Barbareschi or granite.
In this regard, it is exhilarating to do is just shrug that Cruciani, as Pansa, has fixed the climate of hate. I can not even imagine what would come out poisons from the microphones of Radio 24 evening if any Pasdaran Berlusconi was attacked in the street a few days after his big face had appeared on a black list on a sheet of the army of evil. Already have these crazy things (think of recent cases and Belpietro Capezzone) without liste nere, figuriamoci con . Poi intendiamoci, io –ribadisco– non ritengo che nello scenario politico sussista un clima d'odio foriero di violenza fisica, né da una parte né dall'altra, e quindi non imputo a Libero il rischio di armare la mano di qualche sciagurato. Però chi ci crede dovrebbe avere la coerenza di crederci sempre e non solo quando fa comodo.
Ma quanto sopra non è l'unico aspetto d'incoerenza. C'è poi la questione del tradimento e dei traditori . L'accento forte che Libero pone su questa terminologia dovrebbe non dico far sobbalzare ma almeno scuotere un pochino il nostro Crux, se è vero che questi, come ripetutamente argued recently, believes that " categories of betrayal and loyalty should not exist in politics . And instead of nothing. Not a bah mah or, even a little "legitimate campaign, but frankly excessive." Nothing .
And to say that the maximum Crux just quoted is beautiful and holy. The policy is to pursue the ideas and objectives to be achieved, not with feelings and emotional ties with. The political alliances are not marriages. A political partnership based on a real communion of ideas and intentions, not on mutual oaths of loyalty, not even this was a Masonic sect. If you are not bases of the agreement, or if the trust decade, a break is the natural consequence.
Then behind a break may be all it is obvious. Deep political motives, or mere opportunism, or at worst strictly personal conveniences. But that's another story. The fact remains that the political alliances of the game is not played at a level of romantic loyalty and betrayal, but at a pragmatic level between the persistence of shared objectives and their disappearance.
holiday tomorrow. We return on Thursday, barring unforeseen circumstances.
-------------------------------------
Bon Jovi, "Wanted Dead Or Alive "(1986)
I'm a cowboy, on a steel horse I ride
I'm wanted dead or alive...
0 comments:
Post a Comment